Hi, I had a look into Epiphany in GNOME Web and I think that it follows quite a straightforward approach. Although I didn't quite get the concept of annotations and since I use Ubuntu I won't be able to test Edge. Could you help me out with that.
Thanks Thanking You, Utkarsh Dhawan (Developer/Student) Note:Please Consider The environment before printing. On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 1:45 AM, Sam P. <sam@sam.today> wrote: > Hi Utakarsh, > > I am not familiar with Richa's project, however maybe you could look into > surfacing the WebInspector provided by webkitgtk+ in your ui? It is a > pretty standard web inspector, and is used by Epiphany (GNOME Web) and > Safari. See the WebKit2 api for this [1]. > > Maybe another feature to evaluate is annotations? Browse currently has > the consept of bookmarking (adding a site to the bottom bar) and saving it > in the journal. However it could be very helpful for researching users to > be able to annotate the page and save that in the bookmark. The Microsoft > Edge browser has a similar feature, although doesn't intergrate with their > bookmarking system (which is very different from ours anyway) and seems to > rely on annotating a png screenshot of the webpage rather than the actual > page. > > Thanks, > Sam > > [1] > http://webkitgtk.org/reference/webkit2gtk/unstable/WebKitWebView.html#webkit-web-view-get-inspector > > On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 12:01 AM utkarsh Dhawan <dhawanutka...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Last year Richa was involved in the JavaScript Interactive Shell project, >> which I guess was successfully completed.As far as I remember it pretty >> much was on the tracks of Tony's idea of the generic toolbar button , >> though it only had three options in totality Save file,Open file and Open >> Web console.I would really like to continue on this project with the other >> features enhancing the browse. >> >> Thanking You, >> Utkarsh Dhawan >> (Developer/Student) >> >> Note:Please Consider The environment before printing. >> >> On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 10:01 AM, Tony Anderson <tony_ander...@usa.net> >> wrote: >> >>> I suspect we need a GSOC task to make this project visible. The GSOC >>> task could define the starting point (webkit2 or new branch). We still have >>> Richa Sehgal's contribution from last year to integrate with Browse. >>> Godiard believes that some developer tools are available in Browse but not >>> directly by the toolbar. I would like to see a 'generic' toolbar button >>> like Firefox/Googles 3x3 array of dots to open up a more complete set of >>> options including access to developer tools like 'show source page', and >>> any like Firebug that can be made available. >>> >>> Tony >>> >>> >>> On 02/23/2016 10:41 AM, Sam P. wrote: >>> >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> Please have a look at the pull requests and the 'webkit2' branch.. >>> Testing and contributions are appreciated. >>> >>> I think this port is very close to done, so would you have enough to do >>> in your project? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Sam >>> On Tuesday, February 23, 2016, Utkarsh Tiwari < >>> <iamutkarshtiw...@gmail.com>iamutkarshtiw...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > Hello everyone, >>> > Few days back I read on a sugar-devel thread >>> > where Mr. James Cameron wrote -> "An interesting blog post describing >>> > the situation with WebKit security >>> > updates: >>> > >>> > >>> https://blogs.gnome.org/mcatanzaro/2016/02/01/on-webkit-security-updates/ >>> > >>> > Browse in Sugar is without security updates because it depends on >>> > an old WebKit version of WebKitGTK+, and the great API break called >>> > WebKit2 has not yet been fixed in a Browse release." >>> > >>> > So are we talking up 'Browse' this summer as a potential GSoC project? >>> > Since I have been working on it for a while and I am getting familiar >>> > with it's codebase, so I would love to work on it. :) >>> > >>> > regards, >>> > Utkarsh Tiwari >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > Sugar-devel mailing list >>> > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org >>> > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel >>> > >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Sugar-devel mailing >>> listSugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.orghttp://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Sugar-devel mailing list >>> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org >>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Sugar-devel mailing list >> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org >> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel >> >
_______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel