On Jun 13, 2017 7:12 PM, "Sebastian Silva" <sebast...@fuentelibre.org> wrote:
On 13/06/17 12:50, Samson Goddy wrote: Your mentioning Facebook, iPhone, Windows, Flash, LinkedIn etc, do not fit with this agreement, so we would sincerely appreciate if you do not promote these entities while representing Sugar Labs. Could you explain more, because i dont understand. And also how did you think i might breach the agreement? While your promoting these entities does not breach the wording of the agreement, I believe it goes against the spirit of it. Please review information on GNU.org such as the following articles, to understand why such technologies are distributed in bad faith. https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/keep-control-of-your-computing.html https://www.gnu.org/proprietary/proprietary-surveillance.html https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/who-does-that-server-really-serve.html I still don't understand what you are trying to say. I believe almost everyone in this community uses Facebook, has LinkedIn account. For the US people they should have iphones. I barely use windows, maybe when i want to play fifa or go to the cyber house for internet. Are you trying to say that i should, throw away my iphone, probably the macbook i use. Close down my facebook account and possible my LinkedIn too? And stop playing online games because they are flash? Is that what you are trying to say? I read the documentations.. i don't see how i breached those rules. Because before i came into the community Sugar Labs was already on Facebook, LinkedIn and Sugarizer was kinda available for Iphone and windows? Please kind you note where and how i breached those rules?. Why are these questions targeted to me only? Why i see people and under softwares understand SFC are using facebook anf LinkedIn to promote their content. I will be waiting for your replies, because i like learning what i don't know. On the other hand, these Sugar Activities (by you) don't have proper sources available. This actually is a breach of the agreement, and they should have been removed: http://activities.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/addon/4759 http://activities.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/addon/4758 In accordance to the license file on those .xo bundles, I request that you share the source for the .swf Flash components embedded if you wrote them, otherwise please make sure they are removed from ASLO. This was a project i did in 2014.. Because kids using the xo laptops were actually playing those mentioned games online. I had to port them as a activity for sugar. I didn't write or own the swf. It is free, there are versions for those in Android which are free also. So if you think it is against Sugar Labs culture, i recommend you take it down yourself. I don't want any arguments. Regards, Sebastian Regards Samson
_______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel