Walter, I guess my question was not clear. My question is about the procedure to address legal issues to Conservancy.
The procedure you (SLOB) follow the first time you want to address Conservancy was to just ask Adam (Sugar Labs rep to SFC) to make a question to Tony. The procedure you (SLOB) follow the second time was to ask SLOBs to approve an answer t (Sugar Labs rep to SFC) to make a question to Tony. I thank in advance to please specify, why do you follow two different procedures for the same process? Regards, Laura 2017-09-15 15:59 GMT-05:00 Walter Bender <walter.ben...@gmail.com>: > > > On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 4:39 PM, Laura Vargas <la...@somosazucar.org> > wrote: > >> Walter, Adam, >> >> Am confused here. Why did we not need a motion to make the question to >> Tony in the first place? >> >> Can you please clarify. >> > > Tony asked for the opinion of the oversight board to several questions. I > posted those questions several days ago and while a discussion ensued, no > one (except me) actually answered the questions. I chose to make a motion > in order to focus on the questions that Tony had posed and to move things > along since there are several members of the community who have said that > this issue is urgent. > >> >> Procedure Note: In my opinion such legal related motions should be >> translated to Sugar Labs main users language: Spanish. This takes time but >> needs to be done so that real Sugar users can understand what the Oversight >> is requesting. >> > > We certainly can discuss this. We'd need some mechanism to execute it. > > regards. > > -walter > >> >> Regards >> >> 2017-09-15 15:26 GMT-05:00 Martin Dengler <mar...@martindengler.com>: >> >>> >>> > On 15 Sep 2017, at 14:13, Lionel Laské <lionel.la...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > >>> > >>> > +1 for the motion. >>> > >>> > @Martin, thanks to wait for all votes or at least the end of voting >>> delay. >>> >>> Sure Lionel - what is the voting delay? I actually was waiting but the >>> wiki had been updated already (not by me) so I figured as the wiki had been >>> updated and the outcome was not in doubt it was ok to summarize it in an >>> email. I agree the delay should govern in the future. >>> >>> > Lionel. >>> >>> Martin >>> _______________________________________________ >>> SLOBs mailing list >>> sl...@lists.sugarlabs.org >>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/slobs >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Laura V. >> * I&D SomosAZUCAR.Org* >> >> “Solo la tecnología libre nos hará libres.” >> ~ L. Victoria >> >> Happy Learning! >> #LearningByDoing >> #Projects4good >> #IDesignATSugarLabs >> #WeCanDoBetter >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Sugar-devel mailing list >> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org >> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel >> >> > > > -- > Walter Bender > Sugar Labs > http://www.sugarlabs.org > <http://www.sugarlabs.org> > -- Laura V. * I&D SomosAZUCAR.Org* “Solo la tecnología libre nos hará libres.” ~ L. Victoria Happy Learning! #LearningByDoing #Projects4good #IDesignATSugarLabs #WeCanDoBetter
_______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
