On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 8:52 AM, Sebastian Silva <sebast...@fuentelibre.org> wrote:
> > On 16/09/17 03:31, Chihurumnaya Ibiam wrote: > > Sebastian, do you mind me saying/assuming that you're bringing this up > because James released 0.111 and you think it has something to do with > OLPC?. > > *Ibiam Chihurumnaya* > > > Hi Ibiam, > > Thanks for your interest! It inspires us to continue to make a stand for > users such as yourself. > > Yes it is a reaction to an arbitrary release process by an employee of > this laptop vendor. > > I would like to add that while I think it is likely that *every* current > and former employee of it, is an *excellent person* individually, and we > have sincere appreciation for their work, *as an organization*, they've > been erratic at best. > > In fact it is not even clear who they are (Inc? Association? Foundation?) > - yet we have remained branded with their logo. > > Sugar Labs has a duty to protect downstream users, developers and vendor > freedom, and to remain *truly *neutral to hardware providers. > > Happy Software Freedom Day everyone! > So much freedom in a software where one developer tries to impose his views because he is (admittedly) pissed off at another developer and because he "thinks he is right". A tainted celebration for our community, at best. > > Regards, > Sebastian >
_______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel