On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 07:46:22AM +0200, Bastien wrote:
> Thanks for the quick feedback!
> 
> James Cameron <qu...@laptop.org> writes:
> 
> > I've just checked a mail server; we still have an alias b...@laptop.org
> > pointing at b...@altern.org.  Let me know if you don't need it.
> 
> Oh, nice.  Thanks for proposing.  b...@altern.org is dead indeed.
> Can you point b...@laptop.org to b...@bzg.fr ?

Done.

> >> - What part(s) of Sugar (including activities) is mostly active?
> >
> > Over the past year, Sugarizer, Music Blocks, and the core activities.
> 
> Okay.  Does it mean that most activities on a.l.s.o are not actively
> maintained?  Because they just work?

No, they mostly no longer work because libraries they depend on are no
longer available.

> >> - Who is using/testing those active parts?
> >
> > Lionel, Walter, Devin, myself, and a few others.  No feedback from
> > schools apart from a study in Madagascar.
> 
> So who is Sugar currently developed for?

I've no clear answer to that.

> >> - Who is supporting Sugar development (including Google through the
> >>   GSoC)?  Is the OLPC association still somehow involved?
> >
> > Sugar Labs, SFC, Google, and One Laptop per Child (OLPC, Inc).
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> -- 
>  Bastien

-- 
James Cameron
http://quozl.netrek.org/
_______________________________________________
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Reply via email to