Hi all, On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 9:18 PM Chihurumnaya Ibiam <ibiamchihurumn...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Peter, > > 1) Clock and Record have been ported to gst1.0 > > 2) There are quite a number of activities that have/are being ported to gtk3 > and more will follow. >
I saw some PRs to port activities to gtk3, but not sure whether we make a release once the porting is done. If we can make a release (where applicable), we can continue to package for Fedora. btw, https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/s/sugar-* is the list of sugar activities we package as of today. > 4) There's an ongoing port of the sugar gtk3 toolkit to python3 and it'll get > to other parts of sugar soon. > > I'd love to assist, but that'll be once i get Fedora up and running. > > -- > > Ibiam Chihurumnaya <ibiamchihurumn...@gmail.com> > > > On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 9:35 AM, Peter Robinson <pbrobin...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hello All, >> >> This is intended to ask questions and seek feedback. >> >> I've not really had time to deal with Sugar for some time, but it also >> doesn't tend to take up a lot of time so it's not been a major >> problem, we glue it together when it breaks etc. >> >> Kalpa has done a good job keeping most of the Activities up to date. >> >> But there's a number of things that are getting to the point where >> they'll need action or they'll break so I'd like to gather details >> from the Sugar community what their plans are here to see if it's >> worthwhile continuing the Fedora support of Sugar. >> >> 1) gstreamer 1.0 support in Activies. The 0.10 series is well and >> truly dead and unmaintained, but there's a couple of key Activities >> that still depend on it. Clock and Record are the two big ones here. >> Are there any plans to move them to gst1? >> >> 2) GTK2 sugar-toolkit, again a number of Activities still haven't >> moved to gtk3, any plans? >> >> 3) eToys, we've not shipped this by default for some time, I plan on >> retiring it and any of it's dependencies in Fedora 29. Good riddance >> sugar-presence-service! >> >> 4) This is the big one... python2. With python2 being EOL real soon >> now is there any interest in moving to py3, I know there was some work >> years ago to do some readiness here with the move to gtk3 but I don't >> remember the details. Fedora is actively moving to python3 and has >> been for some years, I think for at least 6 releases it's been >> possible to run without py2 installed at all. Is this the nail in the >> coffin for Sugar? >> >> Also with my note above about time and the points in between are there >> still people interested in Sugar on Fedora? Anyone interested enough >> to assist? >> >> Peter >> _______________________________________________ >> SoaS mailing list >> s...@lists.sugarlabs.org >> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/soas > > > _______________________________________________ > Sugar-devel mailing list > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel -- Best Regards, Kalpa Welivitigoda http://about.me/callkalpa _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel