On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 04:02:41PM -0800, Alex Perez wrote: > Right, and the goal for Fedora 32 is to eliminate all of those activities. > They > either get patched/ported, or dropped as a packaged activity within Fedora,
As I read this for where things stand as of several hours ago: https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2267#comment-614303 Fedora is set to toss Sugar in its entirety, barring further action? In trying to find something that might be a tractable set of activity packages to target, I'm looking at the set in: https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar-live-build/blob/master/auto/config which is https://github.com/sugarlabs/browse-activity https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugarlabs-calculate https://github.com/sugarlabs/chat https://github.com/sugarlabs/imageviewer-activity https://github.com/sugarlabs/jukebox-activity https://github.com/sugarlabs/log-activity https://github.com/sugarlabs/Pippy https://github.com/sugarlabs/read-activity https://github.com/sugarlabs/terminal-activity https://github.com/sugarlabs/turtleart-activity https://github.com/sugarlabs/write-activity https://github.com/sugarlabs/memorize-activity and in Fedora seems to be (assuming 'calculator' descends from 'calculate'): https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/sugar-browse https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/sugar-calculator https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/sugar-chat https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/sugar-imageviewer https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/sugar-jukebox https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/sugar-log https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/sugar-pippy https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/sugar-read https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/sugar-terminal https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/sugar-turtleart https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/sugar-write https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/sugar-memorize These are just the activity packages themselves, to say nothing of the dependencies, but given that several of those even from that set were originally maintained by Fedora developers that as best I can tell are not active in Sugar efforts now (erikos, bkearney, callkalpa), it's probably more than enough. -- Joe > so > we don't need any dependency on Python 2, which is going away. Any activity > that depends on something as simple as python2-simplejson, for instance, is > already broken in Fedora 32 (not released, in development) > > > James Cameron > November 27, 2019 at 1:16 PM > > Some of the activities packaged by Fedora depend on sugar-toolkit > because those packages haven't had a Port to Python 3. That's what's > bringing sugar-toolkit into the light. > > On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 10:03:46PM +0100, Chihurumnaya Ibiam wrote: > > Sugar-toolkit isn't being used by sugar anymore, sugar-toolkit-gtk3 > is being > used and that has been ported to python3. Sugar-toolkit should be > retired. > > On Wed, Nov 27, 2019, 7:51 PM Thomas Gilliard > <[1]satelli...@gmail.com> wrote: > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > Subject: [Bug 1737929] sugar depends on Python 2 > Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2019 18:08:45 +0000 > From: [2]bugzi...@redhat.com > To: [3]satelli...@gmail.com > > [4]https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1737929 > > Adam Williamson [5]<awill...@redhat.com> changed: > > What |Removed |Added > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > CC| |[6]awill...@redhat.com > > --- Comment #15 from Adam Williamson [7]<awill...@redhat.com> --- > sugar-toolkit depends on python2-simplejson and that went away > already. > This is > prevent SoaS images building in Rawhide, e.g. > [8]https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=39373467 . > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You are on the CC list for the bug. > > _______________________________________________ > Sugar-devel mailing list > [9]Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > [10]http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > > References: > > [1] mailto:satelli...@gmail.com > [2] mailto:bugzi...@redhat.com > [3] mailto:satelli...@gmail.com > [4] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1737929 > [5] mailto:awill...@redhat.com > [6] mailto:awill...@redhat.com > [7] mailto:awill...@redhat.com > [8] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=39373467 > [9] mailto:Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > [10] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > > _______________________________________________ > Sugar-devel mailing list > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > > Chihurumnaya Ibiam > November 27, 2019 at 1:03 PM > Sugar-toolkit isn't being used by sugar anymore, sugar-toolkit-gtk3 is > being used and that has been ported to python3. Sugar-toolkit should be > retired. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Sugar-devel mailing list > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > Thomas Gilliard > November 27, 2019 at 10:51 AM > > > > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > Subject: [Bug 1737929] sugar depends on Python 2 > Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2019 18:08:45 +0000 > From: bugzi...@redhat.com > To: satelli...@gmail.com > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1737929 > > Adam Williamson <awill...@redhat.com> changed: > > What |Removed |Added > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > CC| |awill...@redhat.com > > > > --- Comment #15 from Adam Williamson <awill...@redhat.com> --- > sugar-toolkit depends on python2-simplejson and that went away already. > This is > prevent SoaS images building in Rawhide, e.g. > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=39373467 . > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You are on the CC list for the bug. > > > _______________________________________________ > Sugar-devel mailing list > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel -- -- Joe On ceding power to tech companies: http://xkcd.com/1118/ man screen | grep -A2 weird A weird imagination is most useful to gain full advantage of all the features. _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
