Ok . Thank you for the clarification. On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 4:49 AM James Cameron <qu...@laptop.org> wrote:
> In addition to what Srevin said ... > > Thanks for reading archives. > > No, it doesn't mean that there will be no project selected from Sugar. > > Inactivity in the Sugar and activity repositories is an indicator of > both source code stability and very few active developers. > > For the Sugar project, indications are that we still have two or three > developers with the capacity to mentor. > > We will find out for sure after the application is accepted by Google > and we must select capable mentors. > > You have time yet to demonstrate your capacity to mentor. > > Once GSoC 2021 gets underway, the next threshold is for us to receive > student project proposals that have significant value. > > A lot of dominoes must be positioned in the right order and fall in > the right way. > > https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/Meeting_Minutes-2021-01-06 > shows our GSoC organisation administrators this year will be Jui, > Perrie, and Lionel. Last year was Walter and myself. > > On Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 09:05:28PM +0530, Vishal Bhatane wrote: > > Hi this is vishal, 3rd year student of college of engineering , pune. I'm > > looking forward to contributing to sugarlabs. While going through sugar > devel > > archives I found that in one of the emails it is mentioned Sugar has been > > inactive since GSoC 2020. Does that mean In GSoC 2021 there will be no > project > > selected from sugar ? > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Sugar-devel mailing list > > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > > > -- > James Cameron > https://quozl.linux.org.au/ >
_______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel