Thanks for sharing, the core goal of the project isn't to port just two popular activities to flatpak - they are already on flatpak but porting them to pygame 2.0 would make them work on flatpak as they currently don't work as expected -.
There's a PR <https://github.com/sugarlabs/GSoC/pull/183> to specify the number of activities and it's still open. "Before moving on to packaging, we need to make sure that activity/ activity.info file has all the required fields which means we need to add missing information that is required for packaging." What fields are missing? "The aim in Coding Phase 1 is to make a deep research on what’s new in pygame-2.0, fix the known bugs in the source code and add new features to the applications." What new features would you be adding? -- Ibiam Chihurumnaya ib...@sugarlabs.org On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 1:00 PM Zhengnan Ma <mazheng...@berkeley.edu> wrote: > Dear sugarlab crew, > > > > I hope this message finds you well. > > > > My name is Zhengnan and I am reaching out from UC Berkeley. I am thrilled > to share my GSoC research proposal with you, which is attached for your > review. I would greatly appreciate any feedback you may have on how I can > improve the proposal to benefit both myself and the organization. > > > > Thank you in advance for your time and consideration. I look forward to > hearing from you soon. > > > > Best regards, > > > > Zhengnan > > <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RBNEMQunsiVZV3tbbZjSqXF5ckeTizdWmnBO_xLp-Hc/edit> > [image: Google Document] > Sugar Labs GSoC 2023 Application… > > <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RBNEMQunsiVZV3tbbZjSqXF5ckeTizdWmnBO_xLp-Hc/edit> > > _______________________________________________ > Sugar-devel mailing list > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel >
_______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel