Is that all the feedback you have for me? I’ve removed that section to keep the focus on my contributions rather than personal details.
I appreciate your insights! Could you share any other areas where I can further improve? Regards Anurag Mishra On Thu, Apr 3, 2025, 9:09 PM Chihurumnaya Ibiam <ibiamchihurumn...@gmail.com> wrote: > Programming Languages: JavaScript, TypeScript, C++, Python, C, Java > Libraries/Frameworks: > React, Sass, BootStrap, TailwindCSS, Node.js, ExpressJs, Django, NextJs, > Rust > > Databases: MongoDB, PostgreSQL > > Tools/Platforms: Git, GitHub, Vercel, AWS, VS Code, Postman, Docker, > MATLAB > > > This section has little to do with the project, I don't see why it's there > tbh. > > > > > -- > > Ibiam Chihurumnaya > ibiamchihurumn...@gmail.com > > > > > On Wed, Apr 2, 2025 at 7:31 PM Anurag Mishra <anuragmishra0...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Dear Sugar Labs Community, >> Thank you for the opportunity to refine my Pippy Debugger proposal! Based >> on feedback about enhancing the UX and expanding the debugging scope, I’ve >> made some exciting updates. Here’s what’s changed: >> 1. Enhanced UX for the Debugger Panel >> >> - Original: A basic side panel with LLM suggestions. >> - Updated: The “Debug with Helper” button now opens a dynamic side >> panel that: >> - Highlights the error line (e.g., for i in range(3) missing a >> colon). >> - Shows a chat-style LLM tip (e.g., “Oops! Your for needs a :—can >> you spot it?”). >> - Offers interactive buttons: “Hint,” “Example,” and “Tell Me >> More” for deeper guidance. >> - Updates as the user revises code, styled in Sugar’s bright, >> kid-friendly aesthetic. >> - Why: This makes debugging engaging and intuitive, letting kids >> explore at their pace. I’ve attached a mockup (Pippy_Debugger_Mockup.png) >> to visualize it! >> >> 2. Broader Debugging Scope: Flow and Logic >> >> - Original: Focused mainly on syntax errors. >> - Updated: Now handles program flow and logic too: >> - Uses ast to spot flow issues (e.g., infinite loops: “This while >> never stops—how can we end it?”). >> - Probes logic errors (e.g., “You wanted 10, but it prints 5—check >> range(5)!”). >> - Combines code and output for context-aware tips. >> - Why: Beginners struggle with more than syntax, so this ensures >> well-rounded support. >> >> 3. Teaching Debugging Strategies >> >> - Original: Gave hints but didn’t teach methods. >> - Updated: The LLM now suggests techniques: >> - “Try print(i) here to see what’s happening!” >> - “Test just the loop—comment out the rest.” >> - “What did you expect? Let’s check!” >> - Progressive hints escalate from vague to specific. >> - Why: This builds debugging skills, not just fixes, aligning with >> Sugar’s educational goals. >> >> These updates make the debugger a true learning companion. I’d still love >> your thoughts on the panel’s usability, the flow/logic approach, and >> strategy guidance. Updated draft is attached/linked: >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1kDaOTUjNIghWLVJUuLWUtLNLC9XB3hWYoDoOO_kWGV4/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.7ajmtdnyhjmz. >> I’ll hop on #sugar IRC soon to chat more. Thanks again! >> Best, >> Anurag Mishra >> _______________________________________________ >> Sugar-devel mailing list >> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org >> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel >> >
_______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
