Dan Williams wrote:
On Sat, 2006-07-29 at 14:05 +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
Dan Williams wrote:
On Thu, 2006-07-27 at 11:43 +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
- There are places where I want to pass services around through dbus. We should use paths for this right? I couldn't find a way to recreate the objects other than the protected _new_object though.
That's intentional.

Just use the object path of the Service that the PS returned to you.  I
removed the service serialization stuff because the Service's object
path is essentially a pointer to the service, and that's what you send
to the PS to have it operate on.
I'm not sure to understand this.... The use case is:

1 I have a sugar.presence.Activity in the shell
2 I want to pass it to an activity (different process) through dbus. I currently do this with activity.object_path(). 3 From the activity process I want to call sugar.presence.Activity methods (get_id, get_services etc). To be able to do it I need to 'recreate' the object from his path. And I'm doing it using _new_obj.

Ah, I understand.  Two ways, like you suggest.  In both cases, the other
Activity process needs to have a PresenceService object (from
sugar.presence.PresenceService) created for itself.

Solution 1:
Pass the object path from the Shell to the other activity process
through dbus (use type 'o' for object paths rather than type 's' so they
get validated correctly).  Add a "get()" call (or something like that)
to the sugar.presence.PresenceService object that creates the
Python-wrapped D-Bus object, and return it.  Pass the object path into
get().

Solution 2:
Just pass the activity ID, and then call the
sugar.presence.PresenceService's get_activity() method.  However, this
isn't generic and therefore there's no easy way to get a Service or
Buddy object, for example.

I vote for #1 I guess.  There's a benefit to making IPC and RPC
dead-easy for kids to do, but there's a minimal level of complexity with
IPC/RPC anyway that we simply can't cover over.

#1 sounds good to me too. This shouldn't be something frequently needed for writing activities anyway.

Marco
_______________________________________________
Sugar mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.laptop.org/mailman/listinfo/sugar

Reply via email to