Robert Staudinger wrote:
On 7/29/06, Marco Pesenti Gritti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yeah, on a second thought I'd like to propose the following
> "refactorings":
> + Move to LGPL. Seems you are the only one credited so far so it
> should be easy if it is ok for you. Maybe some day it should go into
> the gnome platform and GPL is a problem for that ...
> + Rename src/ to gecko-embed/ as mentioned above, that would allow for
> subclassing by library consumers (without hacks like conditional
> includes in public headers, that is).
> + Rename GeckoEmbed to GeckoBrowser and geckoembed.Embed to
> geckoembed.Browser. That would make more sense with a subclass called
> GeckoEditor/geckoembed.Editor.
> + (not as important) rename gecko-embed.pc to gecko-embed-1.pc and
> libgeckoembed.so to libgeckoembed-1.so so we are prepared for more
> major versions if need be.
>
> Would be great if we could do that now before there's a precious cvs
> history to lose / manual intervention required.
These all sounds good! Do you feel like making these changes in cvs (and
get the editor stuff in at the same time) ?
Done except for the relicensing. Galeon and epiphany heritage are
making that a bit more involved.
Thanks! For dealing with the relicensing pain too...
The OLPC's browser app will need fixing (geckoembed.Embed to
geckoembed.Browser).
Give me an accound and I'll do it ;-)
Sure, I sent you mail in private about this.
Marco
_______________________________________________
Sugar mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.laptop.org/mailman/listinfo/sugar
