In the reading I've been doing on OLPC, I've noticed a strong focus on rural children, but I expect there will be lots and lots of urban children; Egypt and China are about 40% urban, Nigeria about 50%, Brazil over 80%, Argentina about 90%. Thailand just 30%. (From: http://globalis.gvu.unu.edu/indicator_detail.cfm?country=CN&indicatorid=30)

Children in rural villages are an important demographic, but children in urban areas look to be just as common. But I've noticed they aren't part of the OLPC narrative. I thought I'd bring this up, because I've noticed some of my own thinking in the last couple days has been along the lines of a nice hierarchy, where there's a many-to-one relationship of students to school, and a clean peer relationship of students to each other. But in an urban environment it will be much more mixed; frequently the nearest school to home won't be the school the child actually attends, and the social peer group and geographical peer group won't be quite the same. Relying on physical proximity -- which seems to be part of the mesh concept -- may include more or less peers than desired.

Anyway, I just wanted to mention this, to be careful that OLPC doesn't focus only on the more romantic and appealing rural demographic.


Another thing that has occurred to me as a possible issue is bandwidth theft. Has there been any discussion on that? I think initially the somewhat novel wireless protocol will help, though potentially any laptop could become a gateway. And I'm not sure if it's even much of a problem if other people use the bandwidth -- I feel a little funny calling it "theft", maybe because of how that word is used by some corporations. As long as people aren't setting up OLPC-based internet cafes, it might not be enough of a problem to even worry about. Especially since it is so hard to detect.

--
Ian Bicking | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://blog.ianbicking.org
_______________________________________________
Sugar mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.laptop.org/mailman/listinfo/sugar

Reply via email to