On Sat, 2006-09-09 at 11:23 -0700, MBurns wrote: > On 9/9/06, Marco Pesenti Gritti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > gtk 2.10... Was this before compiling gtk successfully? > > > > Marco > > > > I believe I was quitting out of the build on earlier modules before > getting to this step. > > Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't gtk going to already be installed > on this machine? To have things like gnome running, gtk is already > required, no? Maybe I misunderstand something. > > Doing some yum searches, it does appear that I have gtk2 package > version 2.8 installed. Is there a preferred place to get 2.10, then, > seeing as it won't show up in my yum updates?
Sugar has customized versions of all of the GNOME packages, so you can't just use your regular operating system versions. Therefore all of the modules have to build successfully in order for sugar to work. owen _______________________________________________ Sugar mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.laptop.org/mailman/listinfo/sugar
