Bert Freudenberg wrote:
Am 11.10.2006 um 10:10 schrieb Marco Pesenti Gritti:
Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
Bert Freudenberg wrote:
Hi,
shouldn't "olpc-artwork" be a dependency of sugar?
I'm running the latest stable build 91 on an A-test board. Today I
updated sugar via yum, got me v0.33 built on Oct 6. Running it, the
icons looked all wrong, red-and-green and much too large. Then I
updated olpc-artwork, v0.13 built on Oct 5. However, all activity
icons and the XO are pitch-black now. It can't be the code, because
my etoys icon shows up nicely colored. So, is the artwork simply
out of sync?
It's probably librsvg. Does updating to the latest librsvg fix your
problem?
The package name is actually olpc-librsvg I think.
It's olpc-librsvg2, and updating that helped, icons look fine, thanks!
Btw, build 96 has the latest sugar.
Marco
_______________________________________________
Sugar mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.laptop.org/mailman/listinfo/sugar
