-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 11:14:29AM +0100, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote: > > Nope, or not necessarily. Right now every "kind" of activity has his own > process but all the activity instances are runned in the same process. > For example all web activities are run in the same process.
That's really unfortunate. That makes the threat model a bit more complicated. What's the reason for this? Memory conservation? > > It's possible that this will change in the future but I don't think we > can/will force all activity instances to run in a separate process, so > the issue has to be considered. > > Marco > - -- Regards, Andrew Clunis -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFbJAUALkUMXSNow8RAkVTAJwIaKzYZK0o8TmXK5Ze3LA77T4ANACgntWB KZ4HGvjACB1PEnwfCVcHDcQ= =IyqA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Sugar mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.laptop.org/mailman/listinfo/sugar
