On Mon, 12 Feb 2007, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
A couple of thoughts about it:
* I think it should only cover the sugar platform, not his dependencies
since we don't have a lot of controls on them and base should be built
only occasionally anyway. (i.e. we should cover sugar-jhbuild build
only)
Isn't it still useful to know whether base has been broken -- whether or
not we have control of upstream? New users are going to have to build
base first anyway, right? And doesn't a broken base prevent new users
from building sugar at all?
* I think we need a way to notify people that broke the build and this
needs to be automatic.(by email, irc, whatever).
I'll work on cleaning up what I've got for more general use. Depends on
the time I have this week, but I'll get something together.
--g
-------------------------------------------------------------
Greg DeKoenigsberg || Fedora Project || fedoraproject.org
Be an Ambassador || http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ambassadors
-------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Sugar mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.laptop.org/mailman/listinfo/sugar
