On Fri, 2007-03-02 at 12:26 -0500, Dan Williams wrote: > Marco, > > Andrew commented yesterday that the use-case is so that Develop can > write the activity's .info file without having to duplicate code. >
Oh my question about the use case was more about the new "comment" field, which is not on the spec yet. > The reason I like this patch is that it doesn't duplicate code. > > The reason I don't like the "set*" parts of this patch is that it > provides API to let any activity modify it's own .info file at any time, > which should be _clearly_ forbidden. If you give people API, they will > use it. > > So I don't know. On the balance, I feel like .info files should be > read-only and those activities that need to modify one should do it > themselves. We've got a .info spec anyway, so it should be relatively > stable. I tend to agree. Marco _______________________________________________ Sugar mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.laptop.org/mailman/listinfo/sugar
