On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 01:59 -0800, Neal Norwitz wrote: > On 3/6/07, Marco Pesenti Gritti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Also, for something like PGO, I would make a separate target or two in > > > the makefile, but it wouldn't be the default target. Is that a > > > problem? I'm currently thinking about 2 options, make pgo-fast and > > > make pgo-complete. The fast target would just run python a bit (ie, > > > use the existing run when building all the modules). The complete > > > target would run the regression test suite which will take an > > > additional 5 minutes or so depending on your box. > > > > I'm not sure how we want to go about this exactly. > > > > Usually we are trying to reuse Fedora packages to avoid additional > > maintenance work. When the changes are generally useful I think we > > should just try to get them upstream. > > Agreed. The problem will be that any performance changes will > probably only be applied to the trunk and not back ported to 2.5. I > suppose we can deal with that latter. First, I'll work on the items > you suggest from the other thread we have dealing with performance.
Oh I actually meant Fedora upstream here. If for some reasons we can't get them there, then I guess we should apply the same criteria of OLPC customization (i.e. we should verify they actually helps sugar or activities). Marco _______________________________________________ Sugar mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.laptop.org/mailman/listinfo/sugar
