Serguei Makarov wrote: > One thing the Bitfrost specification fails to address, and > that no one in the mailing list has raised is security for plugins and > extensions to activities.
Fully agreed; I'm thinking about this a lot. I spoke at PyCon about seeing plugins as critical to managing software growth, so I consider them an important use case. I'm open to ideas on approaching the security aspect -- I have some, but none that I see as clearly good yet. -- Ivan Krstić <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GPG: 0x147C722D _______________________________________________ Sugar mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.laptop.org/mailman/listinfo/sugar
