Eben Eliason wrote: >> I like the size idea, and perhaps it's something we consider for the >> next hardware. >> >> I guess it's the minimalist in me, but I think in this case less is >> more. In other words, my suggestion is not to have anything at all >> for this round, since it seems to me that adding something only >> increases confusion. > > I think this is a reasonable approach as well. Clearly size is the > right way to go, so let's just wait and do it right rather than > putting arbitrary icons on this model which we'll be stuck with later > even when they may no longer be necessary. For the purposes of > documentation, we at least have the advantage of each button having > one side curved and one side straight, for now; Even better, that > will remain true even when their relative sizes are different.
Could you put a bigger (or longer) label in the shape of the button on one of the buttons, and a smaller label in the shape of the other button on that other button? I.e., fake a size difference with labels, while introducing no new shapes? -- Ian Bicking | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://blog.ianbicking.org _______________________________________________ Sugar mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.laptop.org/mailman/listinfo/sugar
