Chris Ball wrote: > Some follow-up points here: > > * These mails aren't being sent automatically at the moment, because I > don't know how often everyone will want to see them. The tinderbox > script generates the mail message, and my plan for now is to send it > out manually when something changes in the results. > > * Do we want these messages to go to sugar@, or is that too spammy? > We can create another list if needed. > >
While we are doing only one build per day sugar@ is probably fine. > * Could we have the logs/*.log files contain only one copy of the > Python tracebacks? That would make these mails easier to follow. > > I'll look into it next week when I'm back from vacation. A ticket would be useful. > * I guess it would be easy to keep a dictionary of "activity name > => maintainer e-mail address", and then CC: the maintainers of > broken activities on these mails. Good idea? > Yeah that sounds good to me. Thanks! Marco _______________________________________________ Sugar mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
