On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 08:18:16AM -0400, Noah Kantrowitz wrote: > Faking X events will be controlled via a bitfrost permission. In > general, if your app doesn't require this functionality it would be > preferable from a security standpoint if you could find a different way > to do this, but it is up to you. The one thing to be aware of is that > permission is considered one of the "high security" ones, and is not > requestable by unsigned apps. This means that if someone makes a > modified version of TamTam and distributes it, such a feature will not > work without the user explicitly granting the new activity the needed > permission.
That doesn't seem like a big problem. Why should an unmodified demo work on a modified TamTam? Surely you can think of a better objection to using fake X events? -- Make April 15 just another day, visit http://fairtax.org _______________________________________________ Sugar mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
