Our rough idea was to say unsigned activities can't talk to each other. signed<->* and sugar<->* would still be allowed though. Should be enough to stop the most flagrant issues, while still allowing interesting uses of DBus.
--Noah On Jul 31, 2007, at 5:26 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote: >>> 2 Activities lose the ability to provide services, which might be >>> useful for direct interaction between activities. Ex. Write activity >>> getting an image from the Camera activity. >> >> Noah has thought more about this issue than I have, since he has been >> working to improve our the state of our messaging security. In the >> mean >> time, however, while I begin to ponder it, is there any list of >> inter-activity relationships that already exist at the present >> time? Or >> any discussion of proposed relationships? > > Well, it's mostly a theoretical concern. Right now we don't have any > of such relationships. I just fear it might be a problem as the > system matures... > > Marco > _______________________________________________ > Sugar mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar > _______________________________________________ Sugar mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
