A correction, SUGAR_ACTIVITY_ROOT it is. I didn't realize this was a done decision. Sorry for the chatter.
On 8/14/07, Michael Burns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 8/9/07, Bert Freudenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > But it is a sugar-specific variable for a sugar activity. Other > > variables like SUGAR_PROFILE or SUGAR_PREFIX might be unset, too. > > > MStone added this as ACTIVITY_ROOT > > Seeing as we need to ask developers to start making use of it, we should > be sure to be happy with the decision. > > SUGAR_ACTIVITY_ROOT versus ACTIVITY_ROOT ... Thoughts, oh wise ones? > -- Michael Burns * Intern One Laptop Per Child
_______________________________________________ Sugar mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
