On Nov 6, 2007, at 1:37 , Michael Stone wrote: > On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 01:02:57AM +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote: >> I'll have to think about that ... it should be larger than tmp/, must >> be writable, preserved for each instance, and possibly shared between >> all instances. > > So it's preserved across each instance but it doesn't go in the DS?
It's used as tmp dir and cache, yes. > Does the DS lack some feature necessary for the data in the sandbox to > be stored in the DS? Sure - compared to a full file system the DS lacks many features. Like, that only one file and mime-type can be meaningfully associated with a DS entry. That there are no hidden entries. Etc. >> I simply added support for SUGAR_ACTIVITY_ROOT before I knew that I'm >> only supposed to use only specific subdirectories of it. > > It was good of you to lead the way; I apologize for not having > communicated more clearly. > >> I'll change it in the next version, but please open a ticket >> anyway ... > > Will do. And let me know if the dirs we currently provide don't > seem to > suffice. > - Bert - _______________________________________________ Sugar mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
