Why not simply run it as the same (non-olpc) user every time? - Bert -
On Dec 22, 2007, at 22:35 , Michael Stone wrote: > Bert, > > Xulrunner hardcodes the use of permissions like 0600 and 0700 all > throughout its code-base. This means that, when Browse stores its > profile information (SSL certs, web cache, ...) in $SAR/data, many > operations fail during the second launch of Browse. > > See > > http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Concurrent_activity_instances > > for some of the gory details of how we tried to work around the > problem > and failed. > > Help in solving this problem in a maintainable way would be most > appreciated. (It is widely felt that patching xulrunner to use > different > permissions will be fragile and unmaintainable unless the upstream > xulrunner folks are willing to accept the patch. Based on this view, > Marco, Simon, and I have contacted several Moz. folks seeking > advice on > how to proceed.) > > Michael > > > On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 09:23:22PM +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote: >> Hi Marco, >> >> just saw your commit to take the Web activity out of its security >> container. What's the motivation behind that? Wouldn't the browser be >> particularly advised to run in the safest manner possible? >> >> - Bert - >> _______________________________________________ Sugar mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
