On Mar 9, 2008, at 9:33 PM, Chris Ball wrote: > * Could use a trie instead of just using Python dicts; it's a little > slow on the XO. > Any other suggestions?
Since dictionaries are constant databases, you might convert them into djb's CDB database which at least at one point had Python bindings. That'll give you a constant two-seek word lookup at the expense of fuzzy matching and incremental search. However, if you're using straight python dicts, you probably don't have either of those now; I haven't looked at the code. -- Ivan Krstić <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | http://radian.org _______________________________________________ Sugar mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
