eben wrote: > Actually, I have a rather silly -o flag at the moment, which lets one > specify an output directory. Maybe I should just make this an output > path (including filename), which would allow one to specify an > alternate filename for the "sugarized" icon. Would this be > appropriate for the use case you had in mind, or would it truly be > better to rename the old backup instead? I'm honestly not too worried
i'd prefer a backup file, but that's just me. i tend to do things like diff the original and the output, to better understand what the script did. and i'm fumble-fingered enough that i could easily see invoking this on the wrong file, and changing something that i didn't intend to. paul =--------------------- paul fox, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (arlington, ma, where it's 36.1 degrees) _______________________________________________ Sugar mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
