On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 7:20 PM, Eben Eliason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > +from palettes import JobjectPalette, BuddyPalette > > > > What about EntryPalette instead of JobjectPalette? An entry in the > > journal is the UI representation of a datastore object/ > > > > self._jobject = None > > + self._jobject_palette = None > > > > Same here, _jobject is the data, CollapsedEntry is one of the UI views > > of this data. I would call it _palette instead of _jobject_palette. > > Well, that's not actually accurate. See, the Collapsed entry is a > "container" for the entry, which contains various details about it. > The palette is specifically attached to the "object" itself, and not > the entry. Consider, for instance, an entry (in the future) with > several objects in it. Consider also, in the current design, that a > single entry may also have several people icons (and palettes) > attached to it. We need to make it clear that the palette belongs to > the icon/object and not the entry as a whole. > > I chose JobjectPalette and BuddyPalette since a) it seems like the > most direct mapping and b) these are also the classes of object that > they take as arguments to the constructor.
I see. I would prefer ObjectPalette then. a) is the right reason but b) shouldn't affect the name of the class. Thanks, Tomeu _______________________________________________ Sugar mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
