On 29.04.2008, at 18:10, Eben Eliason wrote: > Ctrl-Q is likewise redundant with the ctrl-esc shortcut, which is a > mostly non-standard shortcut, but somehow makes sense in this context > anyway. (Hey, it beats alt-F4, right?...there's no logic there that I > can see) In other news, after looking it up, it turns out that > ctrl-esc used to be used to reveal the task manager in Windows, > allowing one to terminate running programs (semantically aligned with > our use here). Oddly, it has since been remapped to invoke the > Windows start menu, with opposite semantics. This despite the fact > that many PC keyboards even have a Windows key which does this anyway. > In any case, I support our interpretation of ctrl-esc and think it > serves the purposes without need for redundancy.
I thought that all ctrl-modifiers should be handled by the activity? Wouldn't alt-esc be more appropriate, since the handler is in the shell? - Bert - _______________________________________________ Sugar mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
