On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 07:26:12PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > We cannot presume that _all_ activities will be able to put a window > in 0.1-0.5s,
I think we are better served by presuming that activities which fail to start quickly are broken need to be fixed. For goodness' sake, we have a processor clocked at over 400 MHz that can play full-screen video. Does someone here actually wish to argue that it's acceptable for process creation, X connection setup, window creation, and painting to take long enough to require secondary feedback mechanisms? Regards, Michael _______________________________________________ Sugar mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
