Sure, that's the point. I heard that issue was already solved and that olpc3-16 would be coming out soon.
Is there anything I can do? Thanks, Tomeu On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 11:40 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Note that afaik Sugar is not starting up at the moment in olpc-3. We > should give dgilmore some help... > > Marco > > On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Tomeu Vizoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 6:45 AM, C. Scott Ananian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> A broken build is not a bad thing, as long as there is still a stable >>> version for people to use. Linus' philosophy of development is valid >>> here: the way to get bugs fixed is to get the code distributed. >>> >>> In my opinion, if the remaining bugs in the FC9 branch are small >>> enough not to interfere with the sugar developer's work, there is no >>> reason why they shouldn't start working with it. The more people >>> looking at that branch, the more people will be able to help Dennis >>> pummel the bugs out of it. >> >> I agree with this. There's important performance work going on in >> upstream projects (mozilla, cairo, poppler, etc) and we are having a >> hard time following up. >> >> Some extra help when rebasing to new fedora versions won't be bad. >> >> Regards, >> >> Tomeu >> _______________________________________________ >> Devel mailing list >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel >> > _______________________________________________ Sugar mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
