great idea. -walter
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 6:39 PM, David Farning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 19:40 +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote: > >> > Finally, there is the issue of work queues. I still have no clue how to >> > represent, using either either Trac or the wiki, the fact that every >> > individual has a work queue which differs from the Global Ticket >> > Priority ordering. People clearly have personal queues for all sorts of >> > reasons including: >> > >> > * people process several tickets concurrently to avoid waiting on one >> > another >> > >> > * individuals often prefer to fix easy, hard, or well-understood >> > things first >> > >> > * people barter work among themselves in order to help one another >> > finish things off; this causes people to work on surprising things >> > >> > (I want to know about personal queues because I want to pay attention to >> > the instantaneous velocity of development [i.e. in order to predict >> > where the code base will have moved to after the next \epsilon units of >> > time have elapsed].) >> >> Couple of random ideas: >> >> * Several people started to add a TODO to their User wiki page on >> sugarlabs.org. We might encourage something like that. It's unlikely >> that everyone will do it and keep it updated though. >> * At Red Hat all the engineers are sending in weekly status reports, >> which also contains a "Plans for this week" section. >> >> Marco > If you go with individuals keeping a personal TODO list on their user > pages, it is very easy to create a master User:TODO list that aggregates > all of the individual todo list. > > This is how I am setting http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Community/TODO . > > thanks > David Farning > > _______________________________________________ > Sugar mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar > _______________________________________________ Sugar mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
