On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 7:19 PM, Erik Garrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 01:53:37PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 1:50 PM, Walter Bender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Alas, two more open bugs that should be considered by someone: >> > >> > (1) Record has been broken in Joyride for quite some time: ever since >> > the introduction of compositing? (#6850) > > I am looking into this.
Awesome. >> >> Joyride has no composite enabled, so this seems to be something different. >> > > According to xdpyinfo the Composite extension is enabled on joyride > 1998. So if this is different it is different in a way that xdpyinfo > does not know. xdpyinfo reports that the composite extension is present, and I think that this has been like this since always. The difference between joyride and faster is that in the latter the window manager includes a composition manager that creates offscreen pixmaps for every window. Look for XCompositeRedirectSubwindows for more details in: http://ktown.kde.org/~fredrik/composite_howto.html http://svn.o-hand.com/view/matchbox/trunk/matchbox-window-manager/src/composite-engine.c?rev=1084&view=markup > On 1998 I get the following messages to the virtual terminal (I assume > they are delivered via printk): > > cafe1000-ccic 0000:00:0c.2: Frame overrun on 1, frames lost > ... <59 printk messages suppressed> ... No idea about this :/ Thanks, Tomeu _______________________________________________ Sugar mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
