On Jun 6, 2008, at 9:04 PM, Jim Gettys wrote: > The community itself needs to decide on a set of people who are the > group of sysadmin people for Sugar's possible move to be something all > are comfortable about.
Please don't top post, and please do quote relevant sections of original e-mails when replying. I don't know what the above statement is referencing, since I never made any claims about who should choose, or act as, the SugarLabs sysadmins. > And for more to contribute in the sysadmin area, the system > administration needs to have redundancy, and actually get documented > and > communicated. Single points of failure is not an option to us at this > date. A single point of failure was never an 'option'; at OLPC, it was a reality due to organizational failings. No reasonable open source community will make those kinds of mistakes. I've offered hardware, bandwidth and root to a small group of trusted SugarLabs people. I'll leave scheduling meetings and discussing it with OLPC to people who have the patience. -- Ivan Krstić <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | http://radian.org _______________________________________________ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar