On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 2:30 PM, Eben Eliason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually, I disagree with adding "Start" separately to the secondary > palette as this will appear redundant beneath the already existing > "Start" label in the primary palette. The better solution (and I > think, the expected behavior) is to make the primary palette clickable > when the palette is anchored, such that clicking it enacts the action > of the button it is attached to. I agree that this is how palettes should work (of course, not the issue here). However, I don't understand your opposition to repeating the "start" option in the submenu. Any journal item already repeats the default option in this list; doing the same for activity bundles is only consistent. If we are going to change this, it is a separate patch. > > > Regarding the other options, I think it would be clearer (albeit, > admittedly, slightly more indirect) to place the list of available > activities in a submenu labeled "Start with" to convey the action that > selecting an activity will take. This would be true of the submenu > regardless of whether or not the entry represents a bundle, leaving us > in a state where the only difference between bundles and instances is > the phrasing used within the menu. Otherwise, they are functionally > identical. This is not a bad idea. Again, if you are serious about this, we should prioritize it and do it, as a separate patch; and I'd be happy to work through the options with you, in a separate thread. Jameson
_______________________________________________ Sugar mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
