On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 17:49, Eben Eliason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 11:39 AM, Tomeu Vizoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 2:32 PM, Bryan Berry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> 2. Tabs -- we need them >>> It takes too long to alt+tab between multiple instance of Browse. I >>> don't think kids will be confused by multiple tabs but we can test this >>> out soon. >> >> Not arguing here about tabs or no tabs, but perhaps improving activity >> switching might alleviate this as well as improving general usability? > > I also won't argue tabs or no-tabs at present (though the initial > designs did have tabs, there were some concerns about them as well). > I'd second Tomeu's comment; the new Frame design as well as the new > alt-tab behavior are *much* better than before. Also, in addition to > the standard alt-tab, I want to add alt-backtick as well to cycle only > through all instances of the current activity. (ticket #7335) This is > specifically to facilitate this use case, would make switching much > more direct.
Whether tabs or windows (instances), I think we need an easy way to open a new blank one, and open a link in a new one. Morgan _______________________________________________ Sugar mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
