On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 5:37 AM, C. Scott Ananian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > a) SSL overhead being "impractical"? Come on. You can use SSL on the > browser today; there is no perceptible speed difference. I agree that > client certs may be impractical, but it won't be because the XO can't > handle the computation.
Scott - please! We need to raise the level of discussion here. SSL overhead on the *network* and on the XS cpu, though Carol rightly points out we don't need to carry that in all the traffic. There is a _ton_ of work on the PKI side, and she's volunteered to work on that though :-) > The real question to me is whether there are size The REAL question here is how do we stop this list being armchair quaterbacking, and start fostering coding work. This thread is a bad bad start. Someone has done a TON of work on Browse, and here is a ton of people ready to throw it out hte window based on opinions. That is *stupid*. Consider replacing it when someone comes up with *working code*. Wake me up when someone has working code - the rest is *noise*. cheers, m -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- School Server Architect - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff _______________________________________________ Sugar mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
