On Sat, 2008-07-12 at 12:23 -0400, Zach Riggle wrote: > Hi Riccardo, thanks for the interest. > > > - Not yet. This is more of a limitation of the SimpleXMLRPCServer > implementation than that of sugarbot. Adding an argument to the rpc-functions should do it; what am I missing ?
> - Not yet. I am looking at using either DBUS or encapsulating the > Sugar scripts to run inside a process I control. Please ping me when you arrive at the point of engineering this part; I'll do the same if that's ok for you. I'd like to write/have a tool like this anyway in the next weeks; so, it would be cool to do it together ! ;) > - No, but it would be quite trivial to implement. In fact, since the > scripting functionality is moving to native Python code, you could do > it in whatever manner you prefer. > > > Zach > > On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 4:14 AM, riccardo > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Fri, 2008-07-11 at 18:14 -0500, Zach Riggle wrote: > > Thought some of you might be interested to see how sugarbot > is coming > > along. I've posted about it a few times in the mailing > list. It's > > Google Summer of Code mid-summer evaluation time, and I've > just posted > > a screencast that demo's some of sugarbot's features. > > > > Link: > > > http://gsoc-sugarbot.blogspot.com/2008/07/mid-summer-screencast.html > > > Hi Zach, > > Your work is very interesting ! > > I couldn't find a more detailed introduction/manual for > sugarbot; > is there any ? > > - Does sugarbot supports working over more activities at the > same time? > - Can it automate the shell itself ? > - Can it exec any arbitrary command (from a sb script), ie > without needing to write them on the terminal activity? > - If not yet, are these features planned ? > > Thanks, > riccardo > -- > Zach Riggle cheers, riccardo _______________________________________________ Sugar mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
