On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 3:11 AM, David Farning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> * SugarLabs should try to schedule his release a few months before the >> OLPC release target date (something around 2-3 months). That will give >> us enough time to ensure everything is stable before we start >> integrating the new code in the OLPC distribution. > > Is this lead time too great? Longer lead times will give OPLC greater > stabilization time at the risk of delaying new features. These delays > _may_ start to increase requests for feature freeze exceptions.
Yeah, that's the point I'm uncertain about. Since our schedule is currently largely driven by OLPC needs, perhaps OLPC should suggest a lead time they are comfortable with... The only strong requirement I see in this respect is that SugarLabs feature freeze is *before* OLPC feature freeze (OLPC does not have a sharp freeze date, but an approximate time period should be enough to synchronize). Marco _______________________________________________ Sugar mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
