-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Polychronis Ypodimatopoulos wrote: | At any rate, I will add (I filed a ticket) a sufficiently large (255 | chars?) name field for activities, although I would much prefer | designing this mechanism properly (any suggestions by Sugar(ed) | developers?).
I last discussed this issue with you at http://wiki.laptop.org/go/On_Presence_updates/User_Profiles/Collaboration. ~ I didn't understand your perspective then, and I still don't understand it now. I don't know what you intend to achieve with Activity Type IDs, why they're so short, or how they will be exposed through Telepathy. However, I can ask a question: Why does the name field have to be some fixed size? Would it not be more efficient and flexible to use delimiters and let the size float? - --Ben -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkiJWckACgkQUJT6e6HFtqT6nwCfcSAHTKkrFOoSlBnX4wwTJsfY h1gAn0l19BcTCuLqKhjs2R6VYHqHiKUD =k+PK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Sugar mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
