Greg Smith writes: > I just got word from a decision maker in Uruguay that they are very > concerned about "performance". They say that Sugar is slow. I'm probing > to get more details but I want to evaluate the options in parallel. ... > This may cost us significantly if we don't show improvement. Send me > ideas. Any quick wins would be considered, even if they have a downside > in another metric.
Two alternatives to offer: http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Edubuntu http://edubuntu.org/ http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Xfce http://www.xfce.org/ It's not Sugar, but it's not XP either. I hope even the Sugar fans will agree that if pushing Sugar means a win for XP, then pushing Sugar is not the thing to do. _______________________________________________ Sugar mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
