"Benjamin M. Schwartz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Jerry Williams wrote: > | Seems like this problem for linux was solved with RPM. > | With rpm if something is missing for something you want to install, it > | complains and won't let you install it. > > That's not really the problem we're discussing. We're talking about the > case in which you try to install an old bundle onto a new build, or vice > versa.
Another reason why each build should come with a default bundle. If countries develop their bundles independantly from Sugar evolution, then the problem will just be more painful. If countries have a default bundle to refer to when developing their own, it could help solving dependancy issues indirectly. The default activities could be selected so that 90% of the dependancies for other (known) activities are satisfied. At least, a default bundle combined with a nice GUI for xo-get.py would discourage installation of old bundles on newer builds. And you guys could get rid of the scary red warning on the wiki :) -- Bastien _______________________________________________ Sugar mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
