mikus wrote: > > What would a concise and accurate definition of the wireless lights > > (for 8.2) be? > > To ordinary users, they are 'Meaningless eye candy'. > > They appear to not be 100% reliable if lit. > > They certainly are meaningless when blinking. > > They even appear to not be 100% reliable if not lit.
mikus -- i think brian was looking for something that would fit on the picture, as a label. can you be more succinct? ;-) paul =--------------------- paul fox, [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Sugar mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
