-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 11:41:41AM -0400, C. Scott Ananian wrote: >John Gilmore has been pushing us to get our licensing ducks in a row. >The one remaining problem has been activities and content bundles: we >can't legally distribute bundles that don't have a clear statement of >license.
There is also licensing problems in some PO-files. POT-files should replace PACKAGE with actual package name. PO-files should include both proper copyright and licensing info. As an example, the following has bogus copyright (and the actual translators do not claim copyright), and refer to bogus licensing info (the package "PACKAGE" does not exist): # Greek translation of Chat Activity. # Copyright (C) YEAR THE PACKAGE'S COPYRIGHT HOLDER # This file is distributed under the same license as the PACKAGE package. # Dimitris Sotiropoulos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2007. # Simos Xenitellis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2007. - Jonas Debian Sugar package maintainer - -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkjJQ2MACgkQn7DbMsAkQLjleACgjUUHhYwv3opxl6pcorjKvKs+ 4H4AniUyzswVXx6SGOwtJEbt34ZmV19i =cIFy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Sugar mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
