On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 12:49 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 8:28 PM, Benjamin M. Schwartz > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> | I just thought of a worst problem with the FULLSCREEN approach. >> | FULLSCREEN windows are always on the top of NORMAL windows. >> >> Why is this a problem? When do we need an Activity to be visible, >> full-screen, and yet below a NORMAL window? > > Oh, I had missed the "focused" bit of this parth of EWMH: > > "focused windows having state _NET_WM_STATE_FULLSCREEN" > > I'm more convinced about this approach after having played with it in > GNOME (with fullscreen applications like terminal, totem and > epiphany). As far as I can tell so far the only issue is to keep the > frame always on top, but there are ways to deal with that. > > Sayamindu, what do you think? Should we experiment with this approach? > Give it a try in GNOME... >
I took a look, and it does seem promising. However, in this case, we need to figure out how to circumvent our existing fullscreen code. For the frame, setting it to have _NET_WM_STATE_ABOVE might help. Thanks, Sayamindu -- Sayamindu Dasgupta [http://sayamindu.randomink.org/ramblings] _______________________________________________ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar