On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 9:24 PM, C. Scott Ananian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Let's hammer this out in person at the planning meeting, because it > depends on OLPC picking a release date. Yeah, make sense. As I said, I think we (as SL) should defer decisions about the freeze slip until the meetings anyway. > I've been arguing for March, > but I don't think there is consensus on that yet. If OLPC aims for > early March, and you slip Sugar feature freeze to late January, then > you're right, we're reasonably consistent. If OLPC decides to aim for > April or later, however, then it seems we're getting out of sync. > > I'd like to avoid the situation we had in 8.2, where sugar was in > string freeze while OLPC was still in active development, with lots of > major features not even written yet. We worked that out very > successfully, via lots of "special exceptions" to the string freeze, > but I'd like to try to avoid having to go that way in 9.1 if we can. > It would be better if we all just agree on some dates. I think it will be possible to do better than 8.2, especially if we can get OLPC to settle on solid dates the week of the 17 :) Marco
_______________________________________________ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
