2008/10/17 Marco Pesenti Gritti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 9:14 PM, Chris Ball <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> The current plan is to wait until F10 is released (end of November) >> before rebasing Joyride onto it. > > But the decision to rebase has been made?
Well, I believe Michael, Chris and I are in favor of it, and I haven't heard any strong arguments against doing so. (Then again, I'm not particularly looking forward to the work!) The real question is whether we're going to settle with F10, or try to follow Rawhide or even to wait for F11. My strong opinion is that 9.1 should be based on F10, and I don't yet have a strong opinion on what 9.2 should follow. I think dgilmore has argued that we should be trying to stay absolutely current with Fedora, so that we have a chance to make changes before Fedora stabilizes, and so that every Fedora release has the absolute latest Sugar. (I think we've got enough problems fixing our own bugs, and I don't want to be making changes and trying to stabilize at the same time Fedora is making changes to try to do so.) Anyway, that argument is still open. And if anyone would like to make the strong argument that we should *not* rebase on F10, they should do so before F10 is released and we start trying to move joyride to it. But "unless anyone objects" the plan is to move to F10 ASAP so we're not trying to shake all the bugs out of the rebase the month before we're scheduled to release. --scott -- ( http://cscott.net/ ) _______________________________________________ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar