-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Erik Garrison wrote: > It seems from my reading of mailing lists, IRC logs, and listening to > conversations with people that we are trying to resolve all of these > issues by implementing more code to get around difficulties imposed by > our current data storage implementation and security model. > > My argument is that we can do less work and get an improved result from > the user's perspective by removing the layers of code (datastore and > security restrictions) which prevent applications from behaving as they > normally do on other systems.
Erik: If you want applications to behave as they do on other systems, then why not just use an other system? I am not being facetious, and I hope I don't seem disrespectful. If you are not interested in Sugar's goal of rearchitecting the computer experience to optimize for our students, then don't use Sugar. It sounds to me like your goals would be achieved, for example, by running Andres's debxo-LXDE or the Fedora XO spin, perhaps with minor UI customizations. Sugar is not nearly finished, but it is headed for a realm of new features, including an entirely new metaphor for stored data. You seem to be proposing that we stop that development process because our current betas (Sugar is still in beta) are not up to the quality of mature systems. This upsets me. Please don't derail this train just because it has not yet reached its destination. If you would like to argue that OLPC should not be shipping Sugar, because it is not ready, then I am happy to listen. If you would like to argue that the datastore and Journal, once their implementation catches up with our designs for the future, will still be inferior to traditional filesystems for our target users, then that is an architectural discussion we can have, though you will meet a great deal of resistance. I think you should take a look at Ubuntu Netbook Remix. It's a very stable, simple platform that presents a classic Linux desktop environment in a UI optimized for small computers. You might find that you prefer it over Sugar. There's nothing wrong with that. - --Ben -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkkKBlwACgkQUJT6e6HFtqQrBACdGR27QDeNyHkxYb58CsJjya4l gOQAni6nBGlJZ9E9/a0uqpatCaFV/cyE =O/tm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Sugar mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
